Skip to main content
Ref ID: 22597
Ref Type: Book Section
Authors: Lye Tuck-Po
Title: Uneasy bedfellows? Contrasting models of conservation in peninsular Malaysia
Date: 2005
Source: Conserving nature in culture: case studies from Southeast Asia
Place of Publication: New Haven, Connecticut
Publisher: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies
Notes: Introduction: This chapter juxtaposes Batek environmental ideology with that embedded in the scientific mode of protected areas governance in Malaysia. I will suggest that the local model of environmental relations has global relevance and can help reveal weaknesses in broader (statecentric) claims to biodiversity conservation. One underlying issue will become clear: there is no comfortable fit between scientific and local definitions of conservation. For example, we do not normally recognize as “conservationist” statements such as the following: if there were no people in the forest, the world would collapse
and it is forest peoples, and not urban peoples who <i>jagaʔ həp </i> (guard the forest). These positions are commonly held among the Batek, who are mobile, forest-dwelling, hunter-gatherers of Peninsular Malaysia. They call themselves <i>Batɛk həp</i> (people of the forest). Elsewhere I develop the argument that this association of ideas is part of a broader expression of environmental stewardship (Lye 2002). The Batek certainly share the general conviction that the environment is degrading at an alarming pace and that there needs to be a radical shift in environmental values. Where they depart from the scientific model is in how they conceptualize and represent <i>people</i>—that it is necessary to have people in the forest, guarding it and the world from collapse. This is the theme of this chapter’s discussion.
Date Created: 3/30/2015
Editors: Dove, Michael R.
Sajise, Percy E.
Doolittle, Amity A.
Volume: 54
Page Start: 83
Page End: 116