The editor’s preface. As it is generally customary to say something before these works, by way of introduction, the person to whose care this publication is instrusted, is determined not to render himself singular in that respect. It may not be amiss then to inform the reader, that the editor of these sheets published them by the desire of a friend, whom he thinks himself bound to oblige. Who that friend is, or how these anecdotes came into his hands; whether he has ever written before, &c. are affairs by no means of consequence to trouble the public with a long detail of. Suffice it then to say, that in this history the facts are not made, but related; and thought it might be highly proper (for obvious reasons) to vary them, as well as the names, yet it would have been no less improper totally to have suppressed them. And the editor would caution all particular persons not to take offence at any characters herein after drawn, how particularly soever they may seem adapted to individuals, as there can be no person, how good soever to many of whose virtues, nor any so bad to as many whose vices, numbers may not justly lay a claim: and the reasons are evident. —Virtue and vice, arising from the same respective springs in every one, and being varied only by constitution and external circumstances, they will necessarily wear nearly the same appearance in all those with whom these circumstances are alike: this must needs be evident to all who know any thing of human nature, of which, as has been hinted, this tract is a picture. As to the method to be observed in the course of the work, the compiler frankly owns he shall not be over scrupulous in confining himself to the strict rules of critical nicety, but will rest contented with a narrative as plain and intelligible as possible, interspersed occasionally with such reflexions as naturally arise from the subject, and may be useful or entertaining; —and though he is well assured this performance, if it be judged by the common rules of the Nouvelle, will appear amply defective; yet, considered in itself, he hopes it will not be found so. —And it is necessary to caution the readers, not to form a judgment of a work by rules, which it was never intended to follow. In chronology and geography, the caviling critic will, doubtless, declare this work particularly deficient; but if it be so, let him understand such defect arises neither from ignorance nor neglect, the reasons of which, were he disposed to give them, would sufficiently excuse these defects. On the whole, though the editor is not very sollicitous what these gentlemen may say of him; he would yet, by no means, be supposed to snarl at every one who assumes that name, still less to point out any particular set of men so distinguished; as it is, perhaps, a sign of conscious guilt, for the culprit to arraign his judges. All he means is, that having wrote on a plan, with which every one is not acquainted, he would caution them to read with attention, before they praise or censure a piece, the constituent parts of which, they may not be acquainted with. As for the reflexions occasionally interspersed, they are such as naturally offered, yet he forces them on none; but concludes with the words of Horace: Si quid novisti rectius istis, candidus imperti; si non, his utere mecum. He remains, the public’s most obedient servant, the editor.